Lions often like to chase wolves, wolves often like to chase deer.

A complete sentence has a subject and predicate forming a complete thought.

Two independent clauses are joined together with a coordinating conjunction that precedes a comma.

Can you summarize what you’ve understood in the above steps?

Lions often like to chase wolves, wolves often like to chase deer.

The sentence "Lions often like to chase wolves, wolves often like to chase deer." is not inherently grammatically incorrect, but it may be stylistically improved for clarity or emphasis. It’s currently a compound sentence with two independent clauses separated by a comma. Consider using a conjunction or a semicolon for a smoother transition between the two related ideas.

No change

Lions often like to chase wolves, and wolves often like to chase deer.

From a grammatical standpoint, the sentence is well-structured with clear coordination using the conjunction "and."

wolves, and wolves

Lions often like to chase wolves? Wolves often like to chase deer.

Using a question mark after "wolves" in the sentence is not incorrect in terms of grammar. However, it may create confusion because it appears as if you are posing a question about wolves.

wolves? Wolves

Lions often like to chase wolves: wolves often like to chase deer.#

Using a colon to connect the two statements in "Lions often like to chase wolves: wolves often like to chase deer" is not necessarily incorrect, but it might be considered stylistically unconventional. Colons are often used to introduce or elaborate on a list, explanation, or related idea.

wolves:wolves

Correct sentence

Lions often like to chase wolves, and wolves often like to chase deer.

Option

B

Can you summarize what you’ve understood in the above steps?